YouTube yanks school board meeting from site over COVID-19 comments, later restores it | Illinois

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn


(The Center Square) – YouTube removed videos of an Illinois school board’s meetings because of public comments challenging COVID-19 policies, a problem one state lawmaker wants to fix with a bill that he said would reduce social media censorship.

Springfield District 186 representatives said the district’s June 21 meeting was removed by the Google-owned video platform for violating it’s “medical misinformation policy, presumably due to the public comment portion.”

On Monday, Board President Anthony Mares said the school board encourages public comments “but we also desire that the public business we conduct at board meetings be widely available through YouTube.

“Therefore we will no longer include public comment in our YouTube meeting videos so that public business is available to distant families,” Mares said.

District spokesperson Bree Hankins said the district appealed YouTube’s decision to remove the video, but that was denied.

“This counted as a warning, but further violations could result in an official strike and we would be unable to upload, post or live stream to YouTube for any purpose for at least one week upon another infraction,” Hankins said. “This has happened to other school districts in Illinois and elsewhere.”

“We never regained access to the removed video via YouTube,” Hankins said. “However, we do have the full versions of the board meeting video.”

The district is working on an on-demand option of full board meetings, including public comments, she said.

After this article was published Wednesday afternoon, a YouTube spokesperson said the video had been restored and no strike against the channel was issued.

“Upon further review, we’re reinstating the Springfield School District’s meeting video,” the spokesperson said in a statement. “We have policies in place to allow content that might otherwise violate our COVID-19 misinformation policies as long as it includes educational, documentary, scientific, or artistic (EDSA) context. In line with our EDSA policies, the video is available again on YouTube.”

District parent Ryan Jugan said one of his public comments about COVID-19 policies to the Springfield school board was censored by YouTube. In a statement, he said “as a parent [and] concerned citizen, witnessing censorship, suppression of medical professionals, science and data is appalling.”

State Rep. Chris Miller, R-Oakland, filed a bill at the statehouse that he said would empower taxpayers to challenge social media censorship.

“This bill would give just the regular citizens a way to push back,” Miller said.

House Bill 4145 would make social media companies liable with punitive damages for censoring someone’s religious or political speech.

“YouTube censuring the school districts and the responses to the school board meetings, this would be an example of where they could have a vehicle to push back against the censorship of their thoughts,” Miller said.

Miller’s bill would allow a minimum of $75,000 in damages per purposeful deletion or censorship of the social media user’s speech, with the exception of, among other things, calls for immediate acts of violence, messages from a fake user or bullying of minors.

The measure has yet to be assigned to a committee.



Source link

Caleb Alexander

Caleb Alexander

Sign up for our Newsletter

Click edit button to change this text. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit